Ranting for the good of the public (transport)

Getting back to me naively thinking I can make a difference, and following on from my recent post regarding my correspondence with members of Her Majesty's Commonwealth Ministry, I also wrote a little while ago to various Powers-That-Be regarding public transport in my fair home town of Melbourne, again as a result of an environmental campaign (this time by the petulantly-named organisation "PT4ME2").

The e-mail I sent out is reproduced below, but it was the responses I got that were more interesting, I regret to say:

Dear sirs/mesdames

I am sending this e-mail as a result of the campaign by PT4ME2, and agree with, and impress upon you, all of the below points. I say this even though I live close to the city and quite close to a railway station - other Victorians should also have easy and cheap access to public transport. I personally use public transport and cycle as much as I can, largely because I have two very young children, and want them to enjoy an Australia like the one I grew up in - not a congested, polluted, cesspool (i.e., covered in filthy water from rising, globally-warmed seas).

However, even if you're a global warming cynic, you can't deny that there are more cars on the roads every day, and everyone seems to be getting a lot angrier out there.

Whenever I look at maps of Melbourne, there are two glaring gaps in the rail network: the huge nothingness between the Hurtsbridge and Lilydale lines (where Doncaster and many other Eastern suburbs are) and the pitifully short Glen Waverley line. Rectifying these seem to me two easy fixes to the transport and pollution woes of Melbourne, and (if we allow ourselves to be a little cynical for a few seconds) sure vote-winners. Further changes would bring even larger rewards.

Here's that stuff I agree with, and thanks for reading/contemplating:

Melbourne is growing and more people need transport. With concern about climate change and rising petrol prices, Melbourne's growth is not sustainable without more and better public transport.

Victorians want more people catching public transport, cycling and walking; fewer trucks on our roads, more freight on rail; and fewer kilometres travelled by car and truck.

Public transport should: be fast, frequent, reliable, affordable and safe; grow as Melbourne grows; be available to all Melbournians; and be managed as an integrated, co-ordinated network.

This means bringing forward existing public transport projects, committing to new projects and accelerating programs to move freight off our roads and onto rail.

It also means rejecting new toll roads and road tunnels because they promote dependence on cars and increase greenhouse gas emissions.

The first, very quick, response I got was from Bruce Atkinson, member of the State's Opposition and the Deputy President of the Victorian Parliament's Upper House, the Legislative Council:

I acknowledge and thank you for your email regarding 'Better Public Transport'.
I strongly support improved public transport and I am keen to establish a broader, more visionary, more contemporary response to the needs of the community.
In that context, I am concerned that the recent Eddington Report did little to evaluate and advocate for the needs of mid to outer suburbs.
I am also concerned about the lack of connectivity in our public transport system planning, including the failure to address north-south routes, as well as areas such as Doncaster and Rowville that are not adequately serviced.
I will continue to advocate the need for improved public transport services to the current Government and to work with my colleagues to develop policies for the Liberal Party that are more responsive to community needs.
Yours sincerely,
Bruce Atkinson
MLC Deputy President, Legislative Council
Member for Eastern Metropolitan Region

Not a bad response, really. Less impressive was the response from Lynne Kosky, Victoria's Minister for Public Transport and The Arts:

Thank you for forwarding your email to the Minister for Public Transport and The Arts, this acknowledgment of receipt.

That is the response, word-for-word. I don't even know what it means!!!

But I was the most impressed with what appeared to be a personally written response from the Federal Minister for Finance, Lindsay Tanner:

Dear Riley

Thanks for your email. I apologise for the delay in responding.

Although public transport is a State issue, the Federal Labor Government recognises the importance of public transport – especially in the face of climate change. Our National Platform outlines our commitment to working with State and Territory governments on issues of rail transport and urban public transport.

Last year I made a submission to the Eddington Review urging the State government to reject plans for another tunnel or road in the city, and to invest in public transport. I have attached my submission for your information.

Yours sincerely

Lindsay Tanner
Minister for Finance and Deregulation
Federal Member for Melbourne

www.lindsaytanner.com

The submission (which can be found here) was unequivocally in favour of boosting investment in public transport for Melbourne, and reducing our reliance on roads. Mr Tanner - a Tip of the Hat to you, sir.

PS As a literal post-script, I also got a letter in the post about a month-and-half later from the Department of Transport on behalf of the Minister for Public Transport. This letter assured me that "The Government is expanding public transport in Victoria", and released "Meeting Our Transport Challenges" to assist with this (albeit, in May 2006...)

Nothing like a response from a Government Bureaucracy to reassure you in case you had any delusions that you had a voice in a democracy...